The following cases categorized as "rule 3.740 collections" were on the docket in the Orange County Superior Court on Dec. 10. All case details are allegations only and should not be taken as fact:
The following cases categorized as "rule 3.740 collections" were on the docket in the Orange County Superior Court on Dec. 9. All case details are allegations only and should not be taken as fact:
The Orange County Superior Court reported the following activities in the suit brought by First National Bank of Omaha against Beth Torrance on Dec. 10.
The Orange County Superior Court reported the following activities in the suit brought by First National Bank of Omaha against Beth Torrance on Dec. 9.
The following cases categorized as "dissolution with children" were on the docket in the San Bernardino County Superior Court on Nov. 25. All case details are allegations only and should not be taken as fact:
The San Bernardino County Superior Court reported the following activity in the suit brought by Richard Torrance Guard and The County of San Bernardino against Katelyn Paige Guard on Nov. 25: 'Motion Re: Re: Calrification On Child Support Order (100419) By The County Of San Bernardino. (enforcement Governmental)'.
LOS ANGELES – In a trial over allegations asbestos in baby powder caused Amy Fong’s mesothelioma, attorneys for Johnson & Johnson on Friday continued to question if the baby powder she used was the same that a key plaintiff witness contends tested positive for the deadly mineral.
LOS ANGELES – In a trial to determine if Johnson & Johnson Baby Powder allegedly contaminated with asbestos caused a woman’s mesothelioma, documents on Wednesday revealed that at least one Johnson & Johnson executive wrote that the company should consider using corn starch instead of talc powder.
LOS ANGELES – An attorney for plaintiff Amy Fong on Tuesday appeared to be attempting to portray the Korean-mined Johnson & Johnson Baby Powder Fong alleges caused her mesothelioma to be under-tested and under-regulated.
LOS ANGELES – In a taped deposition filmed in September of 2018, a top company spokesman for Johnson & Johnson flatly denied the company knew corn starch was safer than talc in a trial to decide if Johnson & Johnson Baby Powder caused a woman’s mesothelioma.
LOS ANGELES – A physician who has treated hundreds of patients exposed to asbestos said on Tuesday that Johnson & Johnson Baby Powder was the cause of Amy Fong’s mesothelioma, not from breathing air in Hong Kong as Johnson & Johnson lawyers allege.
LOS ANGELES - In a trial to decide if asbestos in baby powder caused a woman to develop mesothelioma, attorneys for Johnson & Johnson on Monday argued that Amy Fong had lived near an asbestos-producing incinerator in Hong Kong that caused her disease.
TORRANCE, Calif. – A pulmonary doctor specializing in lung diseases told a courtroom on Friday that plaintiff Carolyn Weirick’s mesothelioma was not caused by Johnson & Johnson baby powder, while Weirick’s attorneys portrayed him as a biased mercenary for major corporations that recklessly use asbestos in their products.
The attorney for plaintiff Carolyn Weirick sought last week to portray an expert witness for Johnson & Johnson as a highly paid industry spokesman and wrong in his testimony that there was no asbestos in the manufacturer's baby powder during a trial to decide if the product caused Weirick’s mesothelioma.
In a trial to decide if Johnson & Johnson Baby Powder allegedly laced with asbestos caused a woman’s mesothelioma, an expert witness for the company told a jury last week that there was no asbestos in the talc powder.
TORRANCE – An expert witness for plaintiff Carolyn Weirick on Monday told attorneys that baby powder testing by the Food and Drug Administration was not sensitive enough to detect asbestos, while attorneys for Johnson & Johnson portrayed the witness as too dependent on a single source of information.
TORRANCE – In a trial to decide if a Johnson & Johnson product caused a woman’s mesothelioma, the company's attorneys on Tuesday attempted to undercut the testimony of a plaintiff expert witness saying she had shaped her opinions on cosmetic talc powder only after becoming a paid witness.
