Mackenzie Chase has taken a bold step to hold her former employer accountable for alleged labor violations. On April 15, 2025, she filed a complaint in the Superior Court of California, County of Ventura, against Dioji, Inc., doing business as Dioji K-9 Resort & Athletic Club. The lawsuit alleges that the company engaged in systemic illegal employment practices that violated multiple provisions of the California Labor Code.
Chase's lawsuit is brought under the Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA), which allows employees to sue for labor code violations on behalf of themselves and other aggrieved employees. The complaint details a litany of accusations against Dioji, Inc., including failure to pay minimum and overtime wages, not providing accurate wage statements, failing to reimburse necessary business expenses, and not offering proper meal and rest breaks. According to Chase, these practices were intentional and showed a deliberate indifference to employee rights.
The plaintiff claims that Dioji's policies resulted in numerous violations of specific sections of the Labor Code such as §§ 201-204 concerning timely payment of wages; § 226 regarding accurate wage statements; §§ 510 and 1194 about overtime compensation; and §§ 2800 and 2802 relating to reimbursement for business expenses. Chase alleges that Dioji required employees to work off-the-clock without compensation and failed to include non-discretionary bonuses in overtime calculations.
Chase seeks civil penalties from Dioji under PAGA, which could amount to significant financial repercussions for the company. She requests penalties starting at $100 per pay period for initial violations and escalating for subsequent infractions. Additionally, she seeks recovery of attorney fees and costs associated with the lawsuit.
The case highlights broader issues within workplace compliance with labor laws in California. It underscores how companies can face serious legal challenges if they fail to adhere strictly to employment regulations designed to protect workers' rights.
Representing Mackenzie Chase are attorneys Douglas Han, Shunt Tatavos-Gharajeh, Chris Petersen, and Jamie Nguyen from Justice Law Corporation. The case is being presided over by Judge K. Biaker under Case No.: 2025 CUOQE042073.