'Note: Respondent Counsel Will Still Appear In-Person For Oral Argument.'
'Order Filed. Oral Argument In This Matter Is Set For Friday, March 24, 2023, At 9:30 A.m. On March 22, 2023, Counsel For Appellant Filed A Request To Continue Oral Argument Or In The Alternative To Appear Remotely For Oral Argument. The Same Day, Respondents Filed A Letter Brief Opposing The Continuance Of Oral Argument.the Request For A Continuance Of Oral Argument Is Denied.the Court Has Resumed In-Person Oral Argument In All Cases In Which Argument Has Been Requested And The Presiding Justice Will Grant Permission To Appear Remotely Only In Extraordinary Cases. The Request To Appear Remotely Is Granted In Part. The Clerk Of This Court Will Provide Counsel For Appellant With Instructions For Appearing Remotely By Telephone. Appellant's Request Is Denied To The Extent It Requests An Appearance Via Videoconference.in Light Of This Order, Counsel For Respondents May Choose To Appear In Person Or By Telephone. If Counsel For Respondents Intends To Appear Remotely Bytelephone, Notice Of That Intention Shall Be Filed By 4:00 P.m. On March 23, 2023. If Counsel For Respondents Opts To Appear Remotely By Telephone, The Clerk Of This Court Will Provide Instructions For Appearing Remotely By Telephone.order Called In. Vm For Appellant's Attorney.'
Case number G060855 was filed in the California 4th District Court of Appeal on Nov. 8, 2021.