Quantcast

California 4th District Court of Appeal: Actions Taken on July 19

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA RECORD

Sunday, November 24, 2024

California 4th District Court of Appeal: Actions Taken on July 19

Shutterstock 376319674

shutterstock.com

The California 4th District Court of Appeal reported the following activity on July 19 in the suits below:

In Priscilla Siguenza against 24 Carrots Catering and Events, 24 Carrots LLC and 24 Carrots Special Events, Inc.:

'Argument Continued To: Appellant's Request To Continue Oral Argument Is Granted.the Matter Previously Calendared For Thursday, July 21, 2022, At 1:30 P.m., Iscontinued To The September 2022 Oral Argument Calendar. Notice Will Be Given Ofthe New Date And Time.order Called In To All Parties.'

'Filed Proof Of Service. Amended By Appellant Using The Correct Mailing Address For Respondent Counsel.'

'To Presiding Justice For Signature. Appellant's Request To Continue Oral Argument.'

Case number G060388 was filed in the California 4th District Court of Appeal.

In William Best against Tedde Lowry Best:

'Order Filed. Oral Argument In This Matter Is Set For Thursday, July 21, 2022, At 9:30 A.m. On July 19, 2022, Counsel For Appellant Filed An Application For Remote Access To Oral Argument.the Court Has Resumed In-Person Oral Argument In All Cases In Which Argument Has Been Requested And The Presiding Justice Will Grant Permission To Appear Remotely Only In Extraordinary Cases. The Request To Appear Remotely Is Granted In Part. The Clerk Of This Court Will Provide Counsel For Appellant With Instructions For Appearing Remotely By Telephone. Appellant's Request Is Denied To The Extent It Requests An Appearance Via Videoconference.in Light Of This Order, Counsel For Respondent May Choose To Appear In Person Or By Telephone. If Counsel For Respondent Intends To Appear Remotely By Telephone, Respondent Shall File Notice Of That Intention By July 20, 2022, At 1:00 P.m. If Counsel For Respondent Opts To Appear Remotely By Telephone, The Clerk Of This Court Will Provide Counsel For Respondent With Instructions For Appearing Remotely By Telephone.order Called In To All Parties.'

'Request Filed To: Appellant Counsel Request To Appear Remotely For Oral Argument.'

'To Court. Appellant Counsel Request To Appear Remotely For Oral Argument.'

Case number G060508 was filed in the California 4th District Court of Appeal.

In Blanca E. Valdovinos and Jorge V. Gutierrez against Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club:

'Order Filed. Oral Argument In This Matter Is Set For Thursday, July 21, 2022, At 9:30 A.m. On July 19, 2022, Counsel For Appellants Filed A Request For Remote Access To Oral Argument.the Court Has Resumed In-Person Oral Argument In All Cases In Which Argument Has Been Requested And The Presiding Justice Will Grant Permission To Appear Remotely Only In Extraordinary Cases. The Request To Appear Remotely Is Granted In Part. The Clerk Of This Court Will Provide Counsel For Appellants With Instructions For Appearing Remotely By Telephone. Appellants' Request Is Denied To The Extent It Requests An Appearance Via Videoconference.in Light Of This Order, Counsel For Respondent May Choose To Appear In Person Or By Telephone. If Counsel For Respondent Intends To Appear Remotely By Telephone, Respondent Shall File Notice Of That Intention By July 20, 2022, At 1:00 P.m. If Counsel For Respondent Opts To Appear Remotely By Telephone, The Clerk Of This Court Will Provide Counsel For Respondent With Instructions For Appearing Remotely By Telephone.phone In Order To All Parties'

'Request Filed To: Appellants' Request To Appear Remotely For Oral Argument.'

'To Court. Appellants' Request To Appear Remotely For Oral Argument.'

Case number G060673 was filed in the California 4th District Court of Appeal.

In Aimee Boyles against Robin Sisemore: 'Cause Argued And Submitted. Merits. Cause Called. Phillip Szachowicz Argued For Appellant. Susan Stein Argued Respondent. Cause Submitted.'

Case number G060253 was filed in the California 4th District Court of Appeal.

In Linh Tu Bao Tran against Krystal Bich Huyen Vu Ha: 'Cause Argued And Submitted. Merits. Cause Called. Lisa McCall Argued For Appellant. Van Nghiem Argued For Respondent. Cause Submitted.'

Case number G059864 was filed in the California 4th District Court of Appeal.

ORGANIZATIONS IN THIS STORY

More News