Quantcast

California 4th District Court of Appeal: Actions Taken on Sept. 14

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA RECORD

Saturday, November 23, 2024

California 4th District Court of Appeal: Actions Taken on Sept. 14

General court 05

shutterstock.com

The California 4th District Court of Appeal reported the following activity on Sept. 14 in the suits below:

In Blakely McHugh and Trysta M. Henselmeier against Protective Life Insurance: 'Cause Argued And Submitted.'

Case number D072863 was filed in the California 4th District Court of Appeal.

In D. L. against County of San Diego: 'Cause Argued And Submitted.'

Case number D079204 was filed in the California 4th District Court of Appeal.

In Barbara Morgan and Marcia Bordine against GoodGreen 2015 LLC, GoodGreen 2016-1, GoodGreen 2016-1 LLC, GoodGreen 2016-1 Trust, GoodGreen 2016-A Trust, GoodGreen 2017-1, GoodGreen 2017-1 Trust, GoodGreen 2017-2, GoodGreen 2017-2 LLC, GoodGreen 2017-R1 LLC, GoodGreen 2018-1, GoodGreen 2018-1 LLC, GoodGreen 2019-1, GoodGreen Holdings 2016-A Trust, Wilmington Trust, N.A. and Ygrene Energy Fund, Inc.: 'Order Filed. Court Requesting The Parties File Supplemental Ltr Briefs ---'

Case number D079364 was filed in the California 4th District Court of Appeal.

In Alfonso Robinson, Evigildo Lamitar, Janet Roberts, Joan Banks, John Brown and Lyn Ramskill against Golden Beach 2016-2, LLC, Golden Bear 2016-1, Golden Bear 2016-R, LLC, Renew 2017-1, Renew 2017-2, Renew 2018-1 and Renew Financial Group, LLC: 'Order Filed. Court Requesting The Parties File Supplemental Letter Briefs --'

Case number D079369 was filed in the California 4th District Court of Appeal.

In Damian E McLawhorn against Mario Marovic, Petar Marovic and Rosy Marovic:

'Order Filed. Oral Argument In This Matter Is Set For Tuesday, September 20, 2022, At 1:30p.m. On September 14, 2022, Counsel For Respondents Filed A Request For Remote Access Tooral Argument.the Court Has Resumed In-Person Oral Argument In All Cases In Whichargument Has Been Requested And The Presiding Justice Will Grant Permission To Appearremotely Only In Extraordinary Cases. The Request To Appear Remotely Is Granted Inpart. The Clerk Of This Court Will Provide Counsel For Respondents With Instructions Forappearing Remotely By Telephone. Respondents' Request Is Denied To The Extent Itrequests An Appearance Via Videoconference.in Light Of This Order, Counsel For Appellant May Choose To Appear In Personor By Telephone. If Counsel For Appellant Intends To Appear Remotely By Telephone,appellant Shall File Notice Of That Intention By September 16, 2022.if Counsel For Appellant Opts To Appear Remotely By Telephone, The Clerk Ofthis Court Will Provide Counsel For Appellant With Instructions For Appearing Remotely Bytelephone.'

'Request Filed To: Respondent's Request To Appear Remotely For Oral Argument.'

'Returned Document For Non-Conformance. Respondents' Notice Of Intent To Appear By Telephone, Document Not Required. Per Order The Appellant Is Instructed To File Notice Of Intent.'

Case number G060721 was filed in the California 4th District Court of Appeal.

In Marc Perez against Lauren M. Nelson:

'Request To Continue Oral Arg-Denied. Having Read And Considered Appellant's Motion To Continue Oral Argument Andrespondent's Opposition Thereto, Appellant's Motion To Continue Oral Argument Isdenied. The Matter Remains On Calendar For Tuesday, September 20, 2022, At 1:30 P.m.'

'To Presiding Justice For Signature. Order Regarding Appellant's Motion To Continue Oral Argument.'

Case number G060396 was filed in the California 4th District Court of Appeal.

ORGANIZATIONS IN THIS STORY

More News