In Raul Arellano against R.J. Donovan Prison: 'Opinion Filed. (signed Unpublished) The Judgment Is Affirmed. The Parties Shall Bear Their Own Costs On Appeal.'
Case number D074147 was filed in the California 4th District Court of Appeal.
In Lions Community Service Corporation against Civic San Diego: 'Opinion Filed. (signed Unpublished) The Judgment Is Affirmed. Respondent Is Entitled To Its Costs On Appeal.'
Case number D074133 was filed in the California 4th District Court of Appeal.
In Christynne Lili Wrene Wood against The Superior Court of San Diego County:
'Opinion Filed. (signed Published)the Petition Is Denied. The Stay Ordered By The Supreme Court On October 9, 2019 Is Vacated. Crunch Is Awarded Its Costs. (cal. Rules Of Court, Rule 8.493(a).)'
'Order Filed. Petitioner Christynne Wood's Unopposed Application To File A Document Under Seal (including Exhibits) Is Granted. (cal. Rules Of Court, Rule 8.46(b)(1).) The Clerk Is Directed To File The Document Under Seal.the Motion For Judicial Notice Filed By Real Parties In Interest Cfg Jamacha, Llc And John Romeo (collectively, Crunch) Is Granted In Part And Denied In Part As Follows:the Petition For Writ Of Mandate In This Court (exh. L) And Petition For Review In The Supreme Court (exh. O) Filed By The Department Of Fair Employment And Housing (dfeh) Are Records Of The Courts Of This State, And We Take Judicial Notice Of Their Existence And Content (though Not Their Truth). (evid. Code, § 452, Subd. (d); County Of Santa Clara V. Escobar (2016) 244 Cal.app.4th 555, 559, Fn. 1.)pages Available On Dfeh's Public Website (exhs. T And U), Dfeh Publications (exhs. S, V, W, X, And Y), And Dfeh Letters To Wood And Crunch (exhs. B, C, E, F, I, And J) Are Official Acts And Records Of The California Executive Branch, And We Take Judicial Notice Of Their Existence And Content (though Not Their Truth). (evid. Code, § 452, Subd. (c); People V. Castillo (2010) 49 Cal.4th 145, 157; Mangini V. R.j. Reynolds Tobacco Co. (1994) 7 Cal.4th 1057, 1063-1064; Rodas V. Spiegel (2001) 87 Cal.app.4th 513, 518.)emails Produced In Discovery (exhs. A And D), Investigative Interview Excerpts (exhs. G And H), Deposition Excerpts (exh. K), And Declarations By Wood And Dfeh Lawyers (exhs. P, Q, And R) Are Relevant Only For Their Truth, Which Is Not Judicially Noticeable, So We Deny The Motion As To These Materials. (lockley V. Law Office Of Cantrell, Green, Pekich, Cruz & McCort (2001) 91 Cal.app.4th 875, 882.)crunch's Motion To Compel And Motion To Disqualify (exhs. M And N) Were Filed In The Trial Court After The Order At Issue In This Proceeding And Are Irrelevant To The Disputed Issues Here. The Eeoc Website Pages (exh. Z) And Management Directive (exh. Aa) Are Also Irrelevant. We Therefore Deny The Motion As To These Materials. (mangini V. R.j. Reynolds Tobacco Co., Supra, 7 Cal.4th At P. 1063.)'
'Sealed Document Filed******'
Case number D076325 was filed in the California 4th District Court of Appeal.
In Augustine Caldera against Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and James Grove: 'Argument Continued To: Appellant's Request To Continue Oral Argument Is Granted.the Matter Previously Calendared For Thursday, March 19, 2020, At 1:30 P.m., Iscontinued To Monday, April 20, 2020, At 1:30 P.m.'
Case number G057343 was filed in the California 4th District Court of Appeal.