The following cases categorized as "dissolution with children" were on the docket in the San Bernardino County Superior Court on Nov. 30. All case details are allegations only and should not be taken as fact:
The San Bernardino County Superior Court reported the following activity in the suit brought by Andrew J. Compton against Emily A. Compton on Nov. 30: 'Fax: Proof Of Service Of Summons Received.'.
Five out of the top 10 cities at high financial risk are located in Southern California, according to the office of the California State Auditor, and COVID-19 is only partly to blame.
The following cases categorized as "dissolution with children" were on the docket in the San Bernardino County Superior Court on Oct. 30. All case details are allegations only and should not be taken as fact:
The following cases categorized as "breach of contract/warranty" were on the docket in the Orange County Superior Court on Sept. 24. All case details are allegations only and should not be taken as fact:
The following cases categorized as "child support-department of child support services" were on the docket in the State of California Superior Court - Kern County on Sept. 18. All case details are allegations only and should not be taken as fact:
The Orange County Superior Court reported the following activities in the suit brought by Evelyn Compton and Pete Compton against Orleans Townhomes Association and Villageway Management, Inc. on Sept. 24.
The State of California Superior Court - Kern County reported the following activity in the suit brought by County of Kern against Alicia N. Compton on Sept. 18: 'Summons'.
The following cases categorized as "dissolution with children" were on the docket in the San Bernardino County Superior Court on Sept. 3. All case details are allegations only and should not be taken as fact:
The San Bernardino County Superior Court reported the following activity in the suit brought by Nathan Compton against Jeremy Michael Sullivan on Dec. 10: 'Small Claims Hearing'.
The attorney for plaintiff Carolyn Weirick sought last week to portray an expert witness for Johnson & Johnson as a highly paid industry spokesman and wrong in his testimony that there was no asbestos in the manufacturer's baby powder during a trial to decide if the product caused Weirick’s mesothelioma.
In a trial to decide if Johnson & Johnson Baby Powder allegedly laced with asbestos caused a woman’s mesothelioma, an expert witness for the company told a jury last week that there was no asbestos in the talc powder.
TORRANCE – In a trial to decide if asbestos allegedly in Johnson & Johnson Baby Powder caused a woman’s mesothelioma, a plaintiff expert witness on Wednesday said the a top expert witness for the company had called asbestos fibers something else.
