In C. S. and Crosby Swagar against Karen Gentry: 'Opinion Filed. (signed Unpublished) The Judgment Is Affirmed. Gentry Is Entitled To Her Appellate Costs.'
Case number D079741 was filed in the California 4th District Court of Appeal.
In Alma Romero against American Multi-Cinema, Inc.: 'Opinion Filed. (signed Unpublished) The Judgment Is Reversed. Romero Is Entitled To Recover Her Costs On Appeal.'
Case number D080327 was filed in the California 4th District Court of Appeal.
In County of San Diego against Commission on State Mandates: 'Opinion Filed. (signed Published) The Judgment Is Affirmed. Respondents Are Entitled To Their Costs On Appeal.'
Case number D079742 was filed in the California 4th District Court of Appeal.
In John Doe against Grace Community Church: 'Opinion Filed. (signed Unpublished) The Judgment Is Reversed. The Matter Is Remanded For Further Proceedings Consistent With This Opinion. The Plaintiff Is Entitled To Costs On Appeal.'
Case number D079717 was filed in the California 4th District Court of Appeal.
In Arthur Lopez against MUFG Holding Corporation, MUFG Union Bank, N.A. and UnionBanCal Corporation:
'Order Filed. Plaintiff's Request For Continuance Of Oral Argument Is Denied. Plaintiff's Request Does Not Meet The Requirements Of California Rules Of Court, Rule 1.100, In That The Requested Accommodation (a 30-Day Continuance Of Oral Argument Based On Other Deadlines In Other Courts) Does Not "result In Court Services, Programs, Or Activities Being Readily Accessible To And Usable By Persons With Disabilities." Additionally, Plaintiff's Request Fails To Explain How And Why Plaintiff's Medical Condition, As Opposed To His Litigation Schedule, "necessitates The Accommodation," Pursuant To California Rules Of Court, Rule 1.100(c)(2).oral Argument Remains On Calendar Wednesday May 17, 2023 At 9:30 A.m. Copy Of Order Was Mailed And Handed To Appellant (pro Per), But He Refused To Accept The Order By The Clerk At The Window.'
'Received Document Entitled: Appellant's Medical Notes'
'Received Document Entitled: Appellant's Motion For Reconsideration.'
'Received Document Entitled: Appellant's Supplemental To Reconsideration Request'
'Returned Document For Non-conformance. Appellant's Supplemental Filing In Support Of Continuance Request For Oral Argument Hearing Of 5-17-2023, Submitted May 10, 2023.per Instruction Of The Court Matter Is Moot.'
Case number G061254 was filed in the California 4th District Court of Appeal.
In Danut P.I. Tanasescu and S. T. against Jolene Voight, Sohail I. Simjee, D.M.D., Inc. and Sohail Idries Simjee: 'Cause Argued And Submitted. Merits. Case Called. No Appearances By Appellant Or Respondent. Cause Submitted.'
Case number G061347 was filed in the California 4th District Court of Appeal.
In HNHPC, Inc. against Nicole Elliot and The Department of Cannabis Control: 'Cause Argued And Submitted. Merits. Cause Called. Jeff Augustini Argued For Appellant. Deputy Attorney General, Ethan Turner Argued For Respondents. Cause Submitted.'
Case number G061298 was filed in the California 4th District Court of Appeal.