'Order Filed. Plaintiff's Request For Continuance Of Oral Argument Is Denied. Plaintiff's Request Does Not Meet The Requirements Of California Rules Of Court, Rule 1.100, In That The Requested Accommodation (a 30-Day Continuance Of Oral Argument Based On Other Deadlines In Other Courts) Does Not "result In Court Services, Programs, Or Activities Being Readily Accessible To And Usable By Persons With Disabilities." Additionally, Plaintiff's Request Fails To Explain How And Why Plaintiff's Medical Condition, As Opposed To His Litigation Schedule, "necessitates The Accommodation," Pursuant To California Rules Of Court, Rule 1.100(c)(2).oral Argument Remains On Calendar Wednesday May 17, 2023 At 9:30 A.m. Copy Of Order Was Mailed And Handed To Appellant (pro Per), But He Refused To Accept The Order By The Clerk At The Window.'
'Returned Document For Non-conformance. Appellant's Supplemental Filing In Support Of Continuance Request For Oral Argument Hearing Of 5-17-2023, Submitted May 10, 2023.per Instruction Of The Court Matter Is Moot.'
Case number G061254 was filed in the California 4th District Court of Appeal on March 30, 2022.